<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hayley’s perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toddblog.net/2009/05/14/hayleys-perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toddblog.net/2009/05/14/hayleys-perspective/</link>
	<description>It's pretty fun if you say it fast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:22:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://toddblog.net/2009/05/14/hayleys-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddblog.net/?p=824#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>Very well said Hayley. I appreciate your thoughts on this matter. Of course, as many did throughout the &quot;Twitter&quot; fight follow-up I must disclose that I am a friend and fan of Todd. A real value of &quot;Twitter&quot; as I see it, though I don&#039;t &quot;tweet&quot;, is it&#039;s playfulness. Small pieces of valuable information can be shared via Twitter and, when done well, can enhance discourse rather than drag it down. 

&quot;Snarkiness&quot; has a place and it&#039;s a huge part of culture today. Crude and aggressive doesn&#039;t necessarily equal &quot;snark&quot;. I listened to an interview with David Denby who wrote the literal book  on &quot;snarkiness&quot;. You can check it out here: http://www.amazon.com/Snark-David-Denby/dp/1416599452

When &quot;tweeting&quot; and &quot;blogging&quot; and other social media elevate the level of discourse in our culture then let&#039;s cheer them on. Otherwise they are best abandoned like e-mail YELLING. Unfortunately, I don&#039;t this one has completely gone away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said Hayley. I appreciate your thoughts on this matter. Of course, as many did throughout the “Twitter” fight follow-up I must disclose that I am a friend and fan of Todd. A real value of “Twitter” as I see it, though I don’t “tweet”, is it’s playfulness. Small pieces of valuable information can be shared via Twitter and, when done well, can enhance discourse rather than drag it down. </p>
<p>“Snarkiness” has a place and it’s a huge part of culture today. Crude and aggressive doesn’t necessarily equal “snark”. I listened to an interview with David Denby who wrote the literal book  on “snarkiness”. You can check it out here: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Snark-David-Denby/dp/1416599452" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Snark-David-Denby/dp/1416599452</a></p>
<p>When “tweeting” and “blogging” and other social media elevate the level of discourse in our culture then let’s cheer them on. Otherwise they are best abandoned like e-mail YELLING. Unfortunately, I don’t this one has completely gone away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

